Filson

(HC) Williams v. Filson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20192:18-cv-01305California494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCELL WILLIAMS, No. 2:18-cv-1305 KJM KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER TIMOTHY FILSON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. This case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On May 28, 2019, petitioner filed a document styled, “Motion to Clarify Record.” (ECF No. 19.) Petitioner’s motion is not clear, but it appears that petitioner wishes to add in claims that were previously dismissed as unexhausted. However, petitioner has not demonstrated that he has exhausted such claims.

Earlier in this case, petitioner filed a motion for stay. On September 17, 2018, the undersigned recommended that petitioner’s motion for stay be denied, and petitioner be ordered to file an 24 amended petition raising only his exhausted claims (1) and (5). Petitioner did not file objections to the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.