Scalia
(PC) Johnson v. Scalia
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20191:18-cv-00061California702 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL JOHNSON, Case No. 1:18-cv-00061-DAD-JDP
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT
COUNSEL
v. ECF No. 25 J. SCALIA, A. FRITZ,
B. HACKWORTH, J. CAMPOS, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL
A. ARANDA, and DOES 1-4, DISCOVERY
Defendants. ECF No.
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO
SETTLEMENT REQUEST
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
19 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motions to appoint counsel, ECF No. 25, to compel discovery, ECF No. 26, and to refer the case for settlement, ECF No. 28. We address each in turn below. I. Appointment of Counsel Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, see Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), withdrawn in part on other grounds on reh’g en banc, 154 F.3d 952 (9th…