Knoll

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WHEATEN, Case No. 1:18-cv-00885-AWI-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER

NOTICE AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS

v. FOR OPPOSING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KNOLL, et al., (Doc. 35) Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE 16 On August 5, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 35.) Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the Court hereby notifies Plaintiff of the rights and requirements for opposing the motion. 1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summary judgment are briefed in accordance with Local Rule 230(l). 2. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Local Rule 230(l). If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion, this action…