Siebel

(PC) Evans v. Siebel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20191:19-cv-00819California1,111 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD A. EVANS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00819-LJO-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR AN EXTENTION OF TIME AS MOOT

v. (ECF No. 8) K. SIEBEL, et al., ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND REQUIRING

PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE TO

PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION

(ECF Nos. 2, 7) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 19 Plaintiff Richard A. Evans is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on June 12, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On June 18, 2019, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that Plaintiff be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.