Johnson v. Vintage Center LLC

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20192:17-cv-02560California1,640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT JOHNSON, No. 2:17-cv-02560-MCE-CKD Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VINTAGE CENTER LLC, et al., Defendants. 16 Through the present action, Plaintiff Scott Johnson seeks damages and injunctive relief against remaining Defendant Bryan Takeo Corrie (“Defendant”) for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101–12213, as well as California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 51. Plaintiff claims he encountered various physical barriers at Defendant’s restaurant in Sacramento, California. Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment, ECF No. 22, in response to which Defendant filed an Opposition, ECF No. 24, briefly arguing that Plaintiff is not entitled to multiple statutory damages for actual visits and deterrence. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED.1 /// 27 1 Having determined that oral argument would not be of material assistance, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.