Raj
Sream, Inc. v. Raj
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SREAM, INC. and ROOR No. 2:18-cv-02534-TLN-CKD
INTERNATIONAL BV,
12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.
GURMAIL RAJ,
15 Defendant. 16 Presently before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment. This matter was submitted without oral argument. The undersigned has fully considered the briefs and record in this case and, for the reasons stated below, will recommend that plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment be granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs’ claims arise out of defendant’s alleged unlawful importation, manufacture, retail sale, and/or wholesale sales of counterfeit branded water pipes and related parts bearing plaintiffs’ trademarks. The complaint alleges as follows: Plaintiff RooR International BV is incorporated in the Netherlands and is the registered owner of the trademark for RooR branded water pipes. (ECF No. 1 at ¶ 6.) Plaintiff Sream is a California corporation doing business as RooR USA; and is and has been…