(PS) Narayan v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20192:19-cv-00466California406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRAKASH NARAYAN, No. 2:19-cv-00466 TLN CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Presently pending before the court are pro se plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel and motion for permanent injunction. (ECF Nos. 25, 26.) Neither motion has been properly noticed. According to the Local Rules: all motions shall be noticed on the motion calendar of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge. The moving party shall file a notice of motion, motion, accompanying briefs, affidavits, if appropriate, and copies of all documentary evidence that the moving party intends to submit in support of the motion. The matter shall be set for hearing on the motion calendar of the Judge or Magistrate Judge to whom the action has been assigned or before whom the motion is to be heard not less than twenty-eight (28) days after service and filing of the motion. E.D.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.