Carrillo

(PC) Guillen v. Carrillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20191:19-cv-00946California662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCOS CASEY GUILLEN, III, Case No. 1:19-cv-00946-DAD-JDP Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND BE DENIED

v. ECF No. 6 D. CARRILLO,

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Marcos Casey Guillen is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action. The matter is before this court after being removed from Kern County Superior Court. See ECF No. 1. On July 31, 2019, plaintiff moved to remand the case back to state court, asserting that his complaint is based on state law and that a state court can adequately review any related federal claims. See ECF No. 6. On August 6, 2019, defendant filed an opposition to the motion. ECF No. 8. We recommend that plaintiff’s motion be denied. ANALYSIS Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), all parties named in a civil action must consent to a magistrate judge’s jurisdiction before that jurisdiction vests for “dispositive decisions.” Williams…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.