(PS) Cleveland v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20192:16-cv-02308California1,137 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINGO L. CLEVELAND, SR., No. 2:16-cv-2308 MCE AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this products liability case. The case has accordingly been referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for an order requiring the institution where he is currently incarcerated to allow him access to the prison law library. ECF No. 98. On July 8, 2019, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 93. On July 18, 2019, the undersigned granted plaintiff a 60-day extension of time to file his response, in part because of plaintiff’s limited access to the prison’s law library. ECF No. 97. Plaintiff’s response is currently due on or before September 16, 2019. In the instant motion, plaintiff states that he is only able to go to the law library on Saturdays because of his work assignment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.