Lakes

Lakes v. Bath & Body Works, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20192:16-cv-02989California3,031 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL LAKES, an individual, No. 2:16-cv-02989-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Through the present lawsuit, Plaintiff Crystal Lakes (“Plaintiff”) alleges that a candle manufactured by Defendant Bath & Body Works, LLC (“BBW”) malfunctioned such that she sustained burns from molten wax. Plaintiff filed her lawsuit in state court as a California resident, and BBW subsequently removed the action to this Court, citing diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a) and 1441(a) between Plaintiff, a California resident, and BBW, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Ohio. Presently before the Court is BBW’s Motion to Apply Ohio Law to Plaintiff’s Punitive Damage Claim. ECF No. 122. According to BBW, in the face of a conflict between California and Ohio law concerning the extent of punitive damages, Ohio law should control…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.