(PC) Samuels v. CHC Facility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE SAMUELS, No. 2:18-cv-1107-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CHC FACILITY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court determined that his complaint alleged potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to medical needs claims against defendants Battle, Barocio, Shadrick, and Samiinia1 (“defendants”). ECF No. 16. Defendants have since filed a motion for summary judgment (“motion”) wherein they argue that plaintiff failed to administratively exhaust the claims against them. ECF No. 28. After review of the pleadings and, for the reasons discussed below, the court concludes that defendants’ motion should be granted. ///// ///// 27 1 The docket currently lists this defendant’s name as “Seninia.” The court will direct that…