Rios

(PC) Hill v. Rios

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20192:18-cv-03089California1,183 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:18-cv-3089 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On May 8, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion for an order of service. ECF No. 11. Thereafter, on July 16, 2019, he filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). ECF No. 13. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion for an order of service shall be denied as premature. In addition, the undersigned shall recommend that plaintiff’s TRO motion be denied. I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER OF SERVICE Plaintiff’s motion for an order of service appears to ask that defendants be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.