(PS) Alcala v. Murphy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20192:19-cv-00969California383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE ALCALA, et al., CASE NO: 2:19-cv-00969-KJM-CKD

Plaintiffs, v. THERESA MURPHY, et al., Defendants. 16 CASE NO: 2:19-cv-00970-KJM-CKD 17 JESSE ALCALA, et al., 18 Plaintiffs ORDER v.

BUTTE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES,

et al., Defendants. 23 Plaintiffs filed the above-entitled actions. The matters were referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c). On July 8, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiffs and which contained notice to plaintiffs that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiffs filed a notice on July 22, 2019, agreeing to consolidation. (See Alcala et al. v. Murphy et al., 2:19-cv-00969-KJM-CKD, ECF No. 5.) The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.