(PC) Hearns v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20191:17-cv-00038California4,347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMAR HEARNS, 1:17-cv-00038-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART, AND

DENYING IN PART, PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF No. 31.) 14 ROSA GONZALES, et al.,

ORDER FOR DEFENDANT GONZALES

TO PROVIDE A FURTHER RESPONSE

TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

Defendants. PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET

TWO, NO. 1, AS INSTRUCTED BY THIS

ORDER, WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

18 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint filed on February 9, 2018, against defendant C/O Rosa Gonzales on Plaintiff’s claims for retaliation, violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, and violation of the Bane Act. (ECF No. 17.) On July 16, 2018, the court issued a discovery and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.