(PC) Hearns v. Gonzales
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20191:17-cv-00038California4,347 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMAR HEARNS, 1:17-cv-00038-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART, AND
DENYING IN PART, PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF No. 31.) 14 ROSA GONZALES, et al.,
ORDER FOR DEFENDANT GONZALES
TO PROVIDE A FURTHER RESPONSE
TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
Defendants. PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET
TWO, NO. 1, AS INSTRUCTED BY THIS
ORDER, WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
18 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint filed on February 9, 2018, against defendant C/O Rosa Gonzales on Plaintiff’s claims for retaliation, violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, and violation of the Bane Act. (ECF No. 17.) On July 16, 2018, the court issued a discovery and…