Matevovsian

(PC) Ruby v. Matevovsian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20191:18-cv-00200California638 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVE RUBY, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00200-LJO-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO v. ) ALTER JUDGMENT

WARDEN A. MATEVOVSIAN, ) (Doc. No. 38) ) Defendant. ) ) )

Plaintiff Steve Ruby is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2674. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to alter the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). I. BACKGROUND On June 6, 2019, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss the instant action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and judgment was entered. (Doc. Nos. 36, 37.) As previously stated, on June 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to alter the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). Defendant filed an opposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.