Wan
(PC) Cheatham v. Wan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS1
24 Plaintiff is an inmate at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“SATF”) in 25 Corcoran. See ECF No. 1 at 1. Plaintiff names various employees of SATF as defendants in this 26 27 1 We draw the following facts from plaintiff’s complaint, ECF No. 1, and accept them as true for screening purposes. action. Plaintiff alleges that he “had been sexually assaulted and accosted at another California state prison” and informed “authorities” at SATF of that fact. Id. at 4. On November 17, 2016, plaintiff “read a petition begging for and seeking single cell status” to a committee including defendants Wan, Williams, Beltran, Doe 1, and Doe 2. Id. at 4-5. Plaintiff’s request was denied. See id. at 5. Plaintiff also gives a laundry list of conclusory complaints regarding isolated incidents over a three-year span at SATF. See, e.g., id. at 4 (asserting that on October 9, 2016, his mental health doctor, defendant Romero “sabotaged” his efforts to seek “mental comfort and help”); id. at 5 (alleging that on May 25, 2017, defendant Beltran threatened to place plaintiff in S.H.U.); id. at 6 (complaining that his…