(SS) Encinas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20191:19-cv-00470California727 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JULIO C. ENCINAS, No. 1:19-cv-00470-LJO-GSA

11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. FOR DISMISSAL OF CASE FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social

Security, 15 Defendant.

Plaintiff Julio C. Encinas, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint requesting a review of the 18 Commissioner’s denial of disability benefits on April 11, 2019. Doc. 1. On May 28, 2019, the 19 Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and issued a scheduling order and 20 summons to be completed and returned for service within twenty (20) days. Docs. 3, 4 and 5. 21 The scheduling order included detailed instructions for preparation and return of the summons for 22 service by the U.S. Marshal. Doc. 5-3. By July 18, 2019, Plaintiff had not returned the summons and associated documents to the Clerk of Court for filing by the U.S. Marshal, nor taken any other action to serve the 26 Commissioner with the complaint. Accordingly, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.