Bounds

Miller v. Bounds

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20191:19-cv-00806California1,718 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH MICHAEL MILLER, Case No. 1:19-cv-00806-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION AND FOR FAILURE TO

REBECCA BOUNDS, et al., STATE A CLAIM Defendants. (Doc. No. 8) FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff Joseph Michael Miller (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil action on June 10, 2019. On July 23, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted him leave to amend. (Doc. No. 7.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on August 2, 2019, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. No. 8.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.