(PS) Rigor v. California State University Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SORAYA MARIA RIGOR, No. 2:19-cv-00633 KJM AC (PS) Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”). This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). The undersigned rejected plaintiff’s initial complaint on screening, finding that it failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a claim for relief. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on June 24, 2019. ECF No. 4. The FAC is now before the undersigned for screening. I. SCREENING The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff must assist…