Ramos

(PC) Harper v. Ramos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20191:17-cv-00606California518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARCY AARON HARPER, 1:17-cv-00606-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DR. RAMOS,

DR. HTAY, AND DR. VARANASI FOR

DR. RAMOS, et al., INADEQUATE MEDICAL CARE UNDER

THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, AND THAT

Defendants. ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

18 Darcy Aaron Harper (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 1, 2017, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On April 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 9.) On October 11, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 11.) The Second Amended Complaint names as defendants Dr. Ramos, Dr. Htay, RN Blocher, Dr. Varanasi, and RN Wee, and brings medical claims under the Eighth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.