(SS) Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20191:18-cv-00604California7,603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAULA JEAN ROBERTS, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-0604 - JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING THE COMMISSIONER’S ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND v. ) REMANDING THE ACTION PURSUANT TO ) SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(G) )

ANDREW M. SAUL1, ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN

Commissioner of Social Security, ) FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF PAULA JEAN ) ROBERTS AND AGAINST DEFENDANT Defendant. ) ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF ) SOCIAL SECURITY )

Paula Jean Roberts asserts she is entitled to a period of disability and disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff seeks judicial review of the decision denying her application for benefits, asserting the administrative law judge erred in evaluating her credibility. Because the ALJ failed to apply the proper legal standards, the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 20)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.