Estate of Carmen Mendez v. City of Ceres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20191:19-cv-00939California656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ESTATE OF CARMEN MENDEZ, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00939-LJO-BAM

Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE CONSOLIDATED

v. WITH ESTATE OF CARMEN MENDEZ, ET

AL. V. CITY OF CERES, ET AL., CASE NO.

CITY OF CERES, et al., 1:18-CV-01677-LJO-BAM

Defendants. RESPONSE DUE by August 30, 2019

On July 18, 2019, the Court issued an order relating the above-captioned action under Local Rule 123(a) to Estate of Carmen Mendez, et al. v. City of Ceres, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv- 01677-LJO-BAM. (Doc. No. 5.) The matters have therefore been assigned to the same district judge and magistrate judge to promote efficiency and economy for the Court and parties. Further review of the complaints in these related cases suggests that they should be consolidated pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42. Rule 42(a) permits the Court to consolidate actions involving a common question of law or fact, and consolidation is proper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.