Olliff

Grindstone Indian Rancheria v. Olliff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20192:17-cv-02292California2,726 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRINDSTONE INDIAN RANCHERIA No. 2:17-cv-02292-JAM-EFB and ONE HUNDRED PLUS MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN LIVING ON

THE GRINDSTONE INDIAN

RESERVATION, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

Plaintiffs, v. TERRENCE OLLIFF, individually and as a beneficiary/trustee of the Olliff Family Trust,

DIANNE L. OLLIFF,

individually and as a beneficiary/trustee of the Olliff Family Trust, and DOES 1-10, 20 Defendants. 21 This case arises out of a dispute between Defendants Terrence and Dianne Olliff and Plaintiffs Grindstone Indian Ranceria et.al. over who owns a fifty-foot-wide strip of land between their properties. In October of 2017, the Grindstone Indian Rancheria and 100 of its residents (collectively “Plaintiffs”) sued the Olliffs for trespass, intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”), negligent infliction of emotional distress (“NIED”), and declaratory judgment. Compl., ECF No. 1. Pursuant to the parties’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.