Kaur
(PC) Spence v. Kaur
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GERALD SPENCE, No. 2:16-cv-1828 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. KAUR, Defendant.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s
retaliation claim against defendant Kaur. Plaintiff’s first motion to compel discovery and for
sanctions,1 and defendant’s motion to compel discovery are before the court. As discussed below,
the undersigned partially grants the discovery motions, and denies plaintiff’s motion for sanctions
and request for judicial notice.
I. Plaintiff’s Allegations
In his second amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that in 2016, while he was housed at
California State Prison-Solano, defendant Kaur, Sr. Librarian, retaliated against plaintiff for filing
a form 22 against Kaur, by issuing a 128-B and then a CDCR-115 (“RVR”) on the same false