Kaur

(PC) Spence v. Kaur

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20192:16-cv-01828California18,341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GERALD SPENCE, No. 2:16-cv-1828 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. KAUR, Defendant.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s

retaliation claim against defendant Kaur. Plaintiff’s first motion to compel discovery and for

sanctions,1 and defendant’s motion to compel discovery are before the court. As discussed below,

the undersigned partially grants the discovery motions, and denies plaintiff’s motion for sanctions

and request for judicial notice.

I. Plaintiff’s Allegations

In his second amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that in 2016, while he was housed at

California State Prison-Solano, defendant Kaur, Sr. Librarian, retaliated against plaintiff for filing

a form 22 against Kaur, by issuing a 128-B and then a CDCR-115 (“RVR”) on the same false

26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.