Martinez

Martinez v. Harrell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20191:19-cv-00924California1,422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GABRIEL MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-00924-LJO-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

v. STATE A CLAIM ARLAN HARRELL, (Doc. Nos. 3-6) Defendant. FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 I. Background Plaintiff Gabriel Martinez1 (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. On July 12, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted him leave to amend within thirty (30) days. (Doc. No. 3.) Plaintiff was cautioned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s order, the Court would recommend dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and for failure to state a claim. (Id. at 6.) Thirty (30) days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Instead, Plaintiff filed three separate “notices.” (Doc. Nos. 4, 5, and 6.) ///

1 Also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.