Collado

Collado v. Urambula

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20191:19-cv-00996California3,971 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN COLLADO, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00996-LJO-SAB

Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

v. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND

DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED

JUAN URAMBULA, et al., WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 4, 5)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

17 I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This action was commenced on July 19, 2019, through the filing of a complaint with the following named Plaintiffs: John Collado, Lourdes Ayala, Tino Partido, Maribel Ayala, Teresa Ware, and Maria Diaz. (ECF No. 1.) On the same date, Plaintiff John Collado filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2.) The original complaint was signed by pro se Plaintiff John Collado, but not by any of the other named Plaintiffs. (ECF No. 1.) Additionally, John Collado was the only Plaintiff who filed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.