(SS) Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20191:18-cv-01372California783 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANGELIQUE NICOLE HERNANDEZ, No. 1:18-cv-01372-AWI-GSA

11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. FOR DISMISSAL OF CASE FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social

Security, 15 Defendant.

On October 5, 2018, Plaintiff Angelique Nicole Hernandez, proceeding pro se, filed a 18 complaint appealing the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits 19 pursuant to Title II and supplemental security income pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security 20 Act. Doc. 1. The Scheduling Order provided that if the parties could not agree to remand 21 following service of their confidential letter briefs, Plaintiff was to file her opening brief thirty 22 days after service of the Commissioner’s responsive letter brief. Doc. 5 at ¶ 6. The Commissioner served Plaintiff with his responsive letter brief on June 3, 2019. AR 16. Plaintiff did not file her opening brief within thirty days or take any other action concerning…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.