Hamilton
Hamilton v. Bagdesorian
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20191:19-cv-00925California1,249 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NANCY D. HAMILTON, Case No. 1:19-cv-00925-AWI-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION
v. FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT
GARY G. BAGDESORIAN, et al., ORDER
Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 4)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS
17 Nancy D. Hamilton (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 11, 2019, the court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff had failed to allege any claims over which this court had jurisdiction. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was provided with the legal standards and ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Id.) More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s July…