Hamilton

Hamilton v. Bagdesorian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20191:19-cv-00925California1,249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NANCY D. HAMILTON, Case No. 1:19-cv-00925-AWI-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

v. FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

GARY G. BAGDESORIAN, et al., ORDER

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 4)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

17 Nancy D. Hamilton (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 11, 2019, the court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff had failed to allege any claims over which this court had jurisdiction. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was provided with the legal standards and ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Id.) More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s July…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.