Hernandez

(PC) Sekona v. Hernandez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20192:17-cv-00346California4,836 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ETUATE SEKONA, No. 2:17-cv-0346-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JOE LIZARRAGA, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants Hang, Thomas, Banks, and Hernandez, the remaining defendants in this action, have moved for summary judgment. ECF No. 62. Plaintiff opposes that motion and has also filed a motion to compel further discovery responses from defendants. ECF No. 67. As discussed below, the motion to compel is denied and it is recommended that the motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part. I. Plaintiff’s Claims This case currently proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint. ECF No. 18. Plaintiff alleges as follows: Defendant Correctional Officer Hang had been assigned to be plaintiff’s employee assistant in an unspecified case, but did not help…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.