(PS) Brown v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20192:19-cv-00260California475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 SUZANNE BROWN, No. 2:19-cv-260-MCE-KJN PS 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

12 v. AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

13 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., (ECF. Nos. 4, 10) 14 Defendants. 15 On July 24, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 10), 16 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 17 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On August 7, plaintiff filed 18 objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 11), which have been considered by 19 the court. 20 This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an 21 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 22 Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 23 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection 24 has been made, the court assumes its correctness and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.