Matharu

(PC) Renteria v. Matharu

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20191:18-cv-00497California923 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS RENTERIA, 1:18-cv-00497-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE

vs. BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

KABIR MATHARU, et al., PROSECUTE

Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

19 I. BACKGROUND Luis Renteria (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983. On April 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On May 29, 2018, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint as a matter of course. (ECF No. 15.) On December 14, 2018, the court issued a screening order dismissing the First Amended Complaint for violation of Local Rule 220 and failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 22.) On March 6, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint, which awaits the court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.