Matharu
(PC) Renteria v. Matharu
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20191:18-cv-00497California923 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LUIS RENTERIA, 1:18-cv-00497-LJO-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE
vs. BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO
KABIR MATHARU, et al., PROSECUTE
Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
19 I. BACKGROUND Luis Renteria (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983. On April 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On May 29, 2018, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint as a matter of course. (ECF No. 15.) On December 14, 2018, the court issued a screening order dismissing the First Amended Complaint for violation of Local Rule 220 and failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 22.) On March 6, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint, which awaits the court’s…