Salazar

Salazar v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20191:18-cv-00847California6,910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN SALAZAR, 1:18-cv-00847-LJO-EPG

Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND

ORDER RE DEFENDANT CARGILL

v. MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORP. aka JUDGMENT (ECF No. 17) CARGILL BEEF SOLUTIONS CORP.; and DOES 1–100,

Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff John Salazar raises discrimination and retaliation claims under the California Fair

Employment Housing Act and a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy under

California Labor Code § 1102.5. Defendant Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation filed a motion for

summary judgment or, in the alternative, summary adjudication. The Court has thoroughly reviewed the

facts and evidence in the record in light of applicable authorities and only discusses here the facts and

arguments that are material and dispositive. Based on the Court’s review, Defendant’s motion for

20 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.