Knight
(PC) Bobadilla v. Knight
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY BOBADILLA, No. 2:18-cv-1778 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GARY KNIGHT, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s claim that on May 21, 2017, while housed at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”), defendant Knight retaliated against plaintiff based solely on plaintiff’s right to free speech in violation of the First Amendment and includes state tort claims for defamation (slander and libel), false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. On August 1, 2019, plaintiff’s motion to compel further production in response to request number 2 was partially granted, and defendants were ordered to submit documents for in camera review. Following the in camera review, as set forth below, the undersigned finds that no further production of documents is required. Plaintiff’s //// 26 “REQUEST NO. 2: Any and all incident packages generated by Mule Creek Staff…