Kaur

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD SPENCE, No. 2:16-cv-1828 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. KAUR, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Before the court is plaintiff’s second motion to compel further responses to plaintiff’s request for production (set three), second set of interrogatories and request for admissions; plaintiff also requests sanctions. Plaintiff’s discovery motion is partially granted, and his motion for sanctions is denied, as set forth below. I. Plaintiff’s Allegations In his second amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that in 2016, while he was housed at California State Prison-Solano, defendant Kaur, Sr. Librarian, retaliated against plaintiff for filing a form 22 against Kaur, by issuing a 128-B and then a CDCR-115 (“RVR”) on the same false charges. (ECF No. 23.) Although the RVR was subsequently reversed, plaintiff lost 30 days yard, resulting in the loss of law library access. …