Podsakoff

(PC) Gonzales v. Podsakoff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20191:15-cv-00924California502 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MICHAEL GONZALES, Case No. 1:15-cv-00924-DAD-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDER

PODSAKOFF, et al., (Doc. 93) Defendants.

TEN (10) DAY DEADLINE

15 Plaintiff, Michael Gonzales, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 16 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims 17 under the Due Process Clause and the Eighth Amendment for being involuntarily medicated 18 against Defendants A. Podsakoff, L. Lawrence, B. Stringer, J. Medina, J. Juarez, R. Mendoza, 19 and Nurse Gonzales. (Doc. 28.) On November 19, 2018, the Second Scheduling Order issued 20 and scheduled this action for trial before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States District 21 Judge, beginning on November 19, 2019. (Doc. 93.) That order required Plaintiff to file a 22 pretrial statement on or before July 19, 2019. (Id.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.