(PC) Concepcion v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20191:18-cv-01743California463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE CONCEPCION, Case No. 1:18-cv-01743-LJO-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

THE COURT’S ORDER AND TO

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTE THIS ACTION

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATON, et al., (Doc. 11)

Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE

17 On April 9, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s granted her leave to file a first amended complaint. At her request, the Court later granted her additional time to respond to the screening order. (Docs. 10, 11.) Several weeks beyond that extension of time have passed and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint, or to otherwise respond to the Court’s Order. The Local Rules, corresponding with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel, or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.