Kernan

(PC) Hammler v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20191:19-cv-00497California1,233 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLEN HAMMLER, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00497-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. ) RECONSIDERATION, DENYING MOTION TO

BE EXEMPT FROM THE TWENTY-FIVE PAGE

SCOTT KERNAN, et.al., ) LIMIT, AND GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME ) TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. ) ) [ECF No. 26] ) ) )

Plaintiff Allen Hammler is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s August 5, 2019, order striking his first amended complaint, motion to be exempt from the twenty-five page limitation, and request for extension of time to file a first amended complaint, filed August 16, 2019. On May 5, 2019, an order issued finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a cognizable claim. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.