Hubard

(PC) Penton v. Hubard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20192:11-cv-00518California372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY PENTON, No. 2: 11-cv-0518 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER L. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 19, 2019, the undersigned held a telephonic informal discovery conference addressing pending contention interrogatories propounded to plaintiff in early 2019. Plaintiff was represented by Kourtney Kinsel, Attorney at Law. Deputy Attorney General Van Kamberian appeared for defendants Walker, Virga, Donahoo, Bradford, Pool, Morrow, Gaddi, Quinn, Lynch, Salas, and Besenaiz. Nicole M. Cahill, Attorney at Law, appeared for defendant Johnson. Upon review of the joint letter brief, and upon hearing the arguments of counsel, the request that plaintiff be required to provide further responses to the pending contention interrogatories is denied as overly broad and unduly burdensome. See Fed. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.