Baughman

(PC) Womack v. Baughman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20192:17-cv-02708California962 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY JEROME WOMACK, No. 2:17-cv-2708 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 On June 24, 2019, the undersigned recommended that plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. On July 19, 2019, plaintiff was granted a thirty-day extension of time in which to file objections. On August 5, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw both motions for preliminary injunctive relief. Plaintiff states that he agrees with the findings and plaintiff’s motions were prematurely filed, and asks that “both motions be expunged from all court records.” (ECF No. 19 at 2.) Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request to withdraw his motions is granted, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to strike both motions. Because plaintiff’s request to expunge or strike the motions for injunctive relief is granted, the findings and recommendations are vacated. Plaintiff also asks that his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.