Cissna

(PS) Craig v. Cissna

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20192:18-cv-02505California807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, No. 2:18-cv-2505-MCE-AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TERRY CISSNA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Norman John Craig, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action on September 5, 2018. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 6, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations (“F&Rs”) recommending that all claims against all Defendants should be dismissed with prejudice on account of Plaintiff failing to allege any viable causes of action. ECF No. 33. On April 9, 2019, this Court adopted the F&Rs in full and dismissed this case with prejudice. ECF No. 38. Judgment was entered on the same day. ECF No. 39. Now, Plaintiff has filed Motions to Reopen the Case and for a Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order. ECF Nos. 42, 47. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff’s Motions are DENIED. Although…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.