Rivers

Intel Corporation v. Rivers

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20192:18-cv-03061California4,382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INTEL CORPORATION, No. 2:18-cv-03061-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER DOYLE RIVERS, Defendant. 16 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to a Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 third-party subpoena. ECF No. 59. This discovery motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(1). Plaintiff, Intel Corporation (“Intel”), and non-party Micron Technology Inc. (“Micron”) appeared at a hearing on September 11, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. ECF No. 71. For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion in part and DENIES it in part. I. Relevant Background Intel brought this lawsuit against defendant Doyle Rivers on November 27, 2018 seeking relief for breach of contract (non-solicitation agreement), breach of contract (confidentiality agreement), and violation of the Defend Trade Secrets Act, 18, U.S.C. § 1836 et. seq. ECF No. 1 at 1. The operative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.