Juarez

(PC) Stuckey v. Juarez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20191:18-cv-01557California1,380 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANDRE KENNETH STUCKEY, Case No. 1:18-cv-01557-LJO-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING

v. DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS

J. JUAREZ, et al., (ECF Nos. 15, 16, 17) Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Andrew Kenneth Stuckey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 27, 2019, the Magistrate Judge screened Plaintiff’s originally filed complaint, and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim against Defendants Chanelo and Peacock for violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment but failed to state any other cognizable claims against any other defendants. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff was ordered to either file a first amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.