(SS) Prakonkham v. Commissioner of Social Security

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20191:18-cv-00898California5,063 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LILY PRAKONKHAM, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-0898 - JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER REMANDING THE ACTION PURSUANT ) TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(G) v. ) ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF LILY PRAKONKHAM ) AND AGAINST DEFENDANT, THE Defendant. ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ) )

Lily Prakonkham asserts she is entitled to a period of disability, disability insurance, and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff argues the administrative law judge erred in evaluating the medical record and rejecting limitations identified by a consultative examiner. Because the ALJ failed to apply the proper legal standards, the Court REMANDS it for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). BACKGROUND In April 2014, Plaintiff filed her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.