Nunes
Nunes v. Stephens
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ANGELINA NUNES, individually and as CASE NO. 1:19-CV-0204 AWI BAM guardian ad litem for minor children D.X. and L.X., et al.,
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
Plaintiffs TO DISMISS
v. (Doc. Nos. 15, 16) CARRIE STEPHENS, et. al,
Defendants
15 16 This case stems from the allegedly unauthorized access of Plaintiffs’ confidential records by Defendants. Plaintiffs bring two causes of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss by Stanislaus County (“the County”) and Carrie Stephens (“Stephens”), an attorney in the office of County Counsel, and a Rule 12(b)(6) motion by Defendants Arata, Swingle, Van Egmond & Goodwin, PLC (“ASVG”) (a law firm who was contracted to do work on behalf of the County) and Brad Swingle (“Swingle”) and Amanda Heitlinger (“Heitlinger”) (attorneys at ASVG). For the reasons that follow, the motions will be granted in part and denied in part. 25 RULE 12(b)(6)…