Rosenberg

(PC) Bonilla v. Rosenberg

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20192:18-cv-02969California268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, No. 2: 18-cv-2969 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DAVID ROSENBERG, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 21, 2019, the court ordered plaintiff to pay the filing fee within fourteen days. (ECF No. 9.) Fourteen days passed, and plaintiff did not pay the filing fee or otherwise respond to the May 21, 2019 order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.