Biter

(PC) Asberry v. Biter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20191:16-cv-01741California1,377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TONY ASBERRY, Case No. 1:16-cv-01741-LJO-JDP Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT COURT DENY PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND

MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

C. RELEVANTE, R. LOZOVOY, A. FERRIS, and P. GODFREY, ECF Nos. 161, 167 15 Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

ECF No. 170 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

REGARDING MAIL

19 ECF No. 171 20 Plaintiff Tony Asberry, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties moved for summary judgment, which the court denied. ECF Nos. 152, 163. Plaintiff has now filed several motions. I recommend that the court deny plaintiff’s motions for reasons discussed below. I. Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration Earlier in the case, the court denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.