Saniefar

Saniefar v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20191:17-cv-00823California1,055 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 FATEMEH SANIEFAR, Case No. 1:17-cv-00823-LJO-BAM 4 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v. AND REQUIRING ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES RONALD D. MOORE, et al., (ECF NO. 188, 189) 7 Defendant.

The Court has received and reviewed the papers filed in connection with Defendants’ request for

reconsideration, ECF No. 189, including the underlying order issued by the magistrate judge, ECF No.

188, that is the subject of the request, as well as Plaintiff’s response, ECF No. 191, and the supplemental

declaration of Plaintiff’s counsel, ECF No. 198. In its August 15, 2019 Minute Order, ECF No. 196, the

Court expressed concerned that Plaintiff’s supplemental initial disclosures, ECF No. 185-3, simply has

listed every ADA defendant sued by Defendants, and then named those people as witnesses without

knowing anything else about their case(s).

In her supplemental declaration, Plaintiff’s counsel explains, generally, that she and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.