(SS) Beatty v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20192:18-cv-00597California4,841 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LISA BEATTY, No. 2:18-cv-00597-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Lisa Beatty seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI, respectively, of the Social Security Act (“Act”). In her motion for summary judgment, plaintiff principally argues that the decision of the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) is based upon legal error and is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. (ECF No. 15.) The Commissioner opposed plaintiff’s motion and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 24.) ////

1 This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(15) and both parties voluntarily consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.