Chisholm

(PC) Hickman v. Chisholm

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20192:19-cv-01254California1,599 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN DUANE HICKMAN, No. 2:19-cv-1254 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and MATT CHISHOLM, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a Sacramento County Jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This action is referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c). For the following reasons, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; however, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a cognizable claim against a proper defendant. II. In Forma Pauperis Application Plaintiff has submitted an affidavit and prison trust account statement that make the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.