Ju

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 Case No. 2:16-cv-00389 MCE KJN P JOSEPH BIVINS,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, SECOND REQUEST TO MODIFY

SCHEDULING ORDER

v.

Judge: The Honorable Kendall J. Newman Trial Date: Not Set DR. JEU, et al., Action Filed: February 23, 2016 Defendant. 18 Defendant Borges has requested a modification of the Discovery and Scheduling Order to extend the dispositive motion deadline until September 30, 2019. “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if it cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party…